Tennessee Code Annotated § 66-36-101 through § 66-36-103 establishes a mandatory pre-suit notice-and-cure process that governs civil actions for commercial construction defects. Enacted in 2004 and significantly amended in 2020, the statute imposes specific obligations on claimants, prime contractors, remote contractors, and design professionals before any action can be filed. Failure to comply does not simply create a procedural hurdle — the court must abate the action until the claimant gets it right.
Whether you represent a commercial property owner with a defective building, a general contractor defending a claim, or a design professional brought into the mix, understanding this chapter is essential. The following breaks down the statute section by section.
§ 66-36-101: Definitions
The chapter begins with a definitional framework that determines who is covered and what kind of damage gives rise to a claim.
"Action"
An action is any civil action or binding dispute resolution proceeding for damages or indemnity asserting a claim for damage to or loss of commercial property caused by an alleged construction defect. The definition expressly excludes personal injury claims arising from a construction defect — those proceed under ordinary tort law without this chapter's pre-suit obligations.
"Claimant"
A claimant is an owner, including a subsequent purchaser, tenant, or association, who asserts a claim against a prime contractor, remote contractor, or design professional concerning a construction defect. Notably, subsequent purchasers who were not parties to the original construction contract are expressly included.
"Commercial Property"
Commercial property is defined simply as all property that is not residential property. This distinction is significant: the statute does not apply to single-family homes. Residential property — meaning property on which a one-dwelling-unit residence is constructed or to be constructed for a person or family — falls outside the scope of this chapter entirely.
"Construction Defect"
The core concept is broadly defined. A construction defect is a deficiency in, or arising out of, the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, observation of construction, or construction or remodeling of an improvement resulting from any of the following:
- (A) Defective material, products, or components used in construction or remodeling;
- (B) A violation of the applicable codes in effect at the time of construction or remodeling;
- (C) A failure of the design to meet applicable professional standards of care at the time of governmental approval, construction, or remodeling; or
- (D) A failure to construct or remodel in accordance with accepted trade standards for good and workmanlike construction at the time of construction or remodeling.
This definition is intentionally expansive, covering not just the physical work but also the professional design and supervisory roles that precede and accompany construction.
"Design Professional"
A design professional is a person licensed in Tennessee as an architect, interior designer, landscape architect, engineer, or surveyor — regardless of whether that person also functions as a prime or remote contractor on the project.
"Notice of Claim"
The notice of claim is the written notice sent by a claimant to the last known address of the contractor or design professional against whom the claim is asserted. It must describe the claim in reasonable detail sufficient to determine the general nature of the defect, including a general description of the type and location of the defective construction and any damages claimed to have been caused by the defect.
This definition matters because an inadequate notice of claim may restart the clock or require re-service, delaying litigation.
"Prime Contractor" and "Remote Contractor"
Both terms are defined by cross-reference to T.C.A. § 66-11-101 — Tennessee's mechanics lien statute. Generally:
- A prime contractor contracts directly with the property owner.
- A remote contractor is a subcontractor, sub-subcontractor, material supplier, or equipment lessor who is not in direct privity with the owner.
"Service"
Service means personal service or delivery by certified mail to the last known address of the addressee, or as otherwise allowed by contract. Getting service right is critical — the deadlines discussed below are tied to the date of service, and a defective service method can void an otherwise timely notice.
§ 66-36-102: Mandatory Compliance Before Filing
Section 66-36-102 is short but dispositive: if a claimant files an action without first complying with the chapter's requirements, the court shall abate the action — without prejudice — and the action may not proceed until the claimant complies.
This is not a penalty for bad faith; it is a jurisdictional precondition. Courts have routinely abated actions that skip the notice-and-cure process, even where legitimate defects exist and limitations deadlines loom. The statute provides a tolling mechanism (discussed below) to prevent claimants from being prejudiced by complying with these requirements.
§ 66-36-103: The Pre-Suit Notice and Cure Process
Section 66-36-103 contains the operational heart of the statute. It establishes a cascading series of deadlines, rights, and responses that must run their course before an action can be filed.
Step 1: Claimant Serves Notice of Claim
Before filing any action, the claimant must serve a written notice of claim on each prime contractor, remote contractor, or design professional against whom the claim is asserted.
The claimant should endeavor to serve this notice within 15 days after discovery of an alleged defect, or as required by contract. However, failure to serve within 15 days does not automatically bar the action — the consequence of late notice is governed by § 66-36-102, not automatic forfeiture. That said, claimants should not read this as license to delay. A prompt notice of claim starts the 180-day tolling period and preserves the claimant's options.
Step 2: Inspection Rights (Within 10 Business Days)
Within 10 business days after service of the notice of claim, the contractor or design professional may inspect the structure to assess each alleged defect. The claimant must provide reasonable access to the improvement during normal working hours for this inspection.
Inspection rights are broad:
- The inspection may include destructive testing. Before performing destructive testing, however, the party intending to perform it must give the claimant written notice stating: (1) the type of testing to be performed; (2) the anticipated damage to the improvement; and (3) the anticipated corrections or repairs that will be necessary after testing. The party conducting destructive testing must correct and repair any damage it causes.
Step 3: Notice Forwarded to Responsible Downstream Parties (Within 10 Days)
Within 10 days after receiving the notice of claim, the prime contractor, remote contractor, or design professional must forward a copy to each other contractor or design professional whom it reasonably believes is responsible for any defect specified in the notice. The forwarding party must identify the specific defect for which it believes each downstream party is responsible.
Each downstream party who receives a forwarded copy then has 10 business days from receipt to inspect the improvement as provided above.
Step 4: Downstream Written Response (Within 10 Business Days)
Within 10 business days after receiving a copy of the forwarded notice, each downstream contractor or design professional must serve a written response on the party that forwarded the notice. This written response must include:
- A report of the scope of any inspection;
- The findings and results of the inspection;
- A statement of whether the party is willing to make corrections or repairs or disputes the claim;
- A description of any corrections or repairs it is willing to make; and
- A timetable for completion of those corrections or repairs.
Step 5: Contractor's Written Response to Claimant (Within 30 Days)
Within 30 days after receiving the notice of claim, each prime contractor, remote contractor, or design professional must serve a written response to the claimant. This response must contain one of three things:
(1) An offer to remedy the defect at no cost to the claimant, including:
- A report of the scope of the inspection and its findings;
- A detailed description of the corrections or repairs necessary to remedy the defect; and
- A timetable for completion.
(2) An offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment, to be paid within 30 days after the claimant's acceptance.
(3) A written statement that the contractor or design professional disputes the claim and will not remedy the defect or settle the claim.
If no response is served within 30 days, the claimant may — without further notice — proceed to file an action for the claims described in the notice.
Step 6: Claimant's Response to Settlement Offer (Within 15 Days)
If the contractor or design professional makes an offer (option 1 or 2 above), the written response must also advise the claimant that they are deemed to have accepted the offer if they do not serve a written rejection within 15 days of service of the written response.
A claimant who rejects the offer must:
- Serve written notice of rejection within 15 days;
- Include the settlement offer with the word "rejected" printed on it.
This deemed-acceptance mechanism has teeth. Claimants who simply ignore an offer without timely rejection may find that acceptance has been presumed, foreclosing further claims for the described defect.
Step 7: Performance (Or Failure to Perform) on Accepted Offers
If the claimant accepts the offer and the contractor performs (corrects the defect or makes payment within the agreed time and manner), the claimant is barred from proceeding with an action against that contractor for the claim described in the notice.
If the claimant accepts the offer and the contractor fails to perform, the claimant may proceed with an action without further notice.
Where the claimant accepts an offer to repair, the claimant must provide the contractor and its agents reasonable access during normal working hours to perform the correction or repair by the agreed timetable.
Statute of Limitations Tolling
A claimant's written notice of claim tolls the applicable statute of limitations until the later of:
- 180 days after the contractor or design professional receives the notice; or
- 90 days after the end of the correction or repair period stated in the offer, if the claimant accepted an offer to repair.
By stipulation, the parties may extend the tolling period further.
This tolling provision is central to the statute's design. Without it, claimants facing imminent limitations deadlines would have to choose between complying with the notice-and-cure process and protecting their right to sue. The tolling provision allows both.
Key Limitations and Scope
Section 66-36-103(n) sets firm boundaries on what the chapter does and does not do:
-
Contract provisions control. Where a contract provides for its own notice-and-opportunity-to-cure procedure for construction defects, those provisions take precedence over and are in lieu of the obligations in this chapter. Contractors should review their agreements carefully — they may have negotiated different timelines or procedures that displace the statutory defaults.
-
No existing rights are altered. The chapter does not bar, limit, or replace any existing rights, causes of action, or theories of liability, except as specifically provided. It does not create new rights or causes of action, and it does not create or eliminate any defenses.
-
Emergency repairs are permitted. Nothing in the statute prohibits a claimant from making necessary emergency corrections or repairs, even while the notice-and-cure process is ongoing.
-
Offers are not admissions. A contractor's or design professional's offer to remedy a defect or to settle by monetary payment does not constitute an admission of liability with respect to the defect.
-
Failure to follow the process is admissible. The failure of either the claimant or the contractor to follow the procedures of § 66-36-103 is admissible in any subsequent action. A claimant who refuses a reasonable settlement offer, or a contractor who fails to timely respond, can expect that conduct to be placed before the finder of fact.
Practical Implications
For Claimants
- Serve the notice of claim as soon as a defect is discovered. The 15-day target is aspirational, not mandatory, but delay creates risk.
- Draft the notice of claim with sufficient detail — a vague notice may be challenged as failing to trigger the process at all.
- Calendar the 30-day window for the contractor's response. If no response arrives, litigation may proceed immediately.
- Do not ignore settlement offers. A timely, written rejection is required; silence may equal acceptance.
- Track the tolling period carefully. The 180-day toll runs from receipt of the notice by the contractor, not from service.
For Contractors and Design Professionals
- Inspect promptly within the 10-business-day window and document findings.
- Forward the notice to all responsible downstream parties within 10 days of receipt, or risk losing contribution rights.
- Respond to the claimant within 30 days with one of the three statutory options. Silence gives the claimant an immediate right to sue.
- An offer to repair must be specific — including a timetable — and must be honored. An accepted offer that is not performed gives the claimant the right to proceed without further notice.
- Review your contracts. If your construction agreements contain notice-and-cure provisions, those provisions may govern in lieu of the statute.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Tennessee's construction defect statute is deadline-driven and fact-specific. Contact our construction litigation team for guidance on your specific situation.

Shareholder · Nashville
Business and intellectual property counsel to founders, creative companies, and technology businesses.
This article is general information about the law as of its publication date, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. The law changes; consult counsel about your specific situation.